Late changes to the April pamphlet
Hmm. Something else just popped up... why was this change necessary, do you think?
Current theories:
1. It's a pretty awful scan, but that *doesn't* look like Sue Doughty to me. Maybe the image was dropped because a caption change to 'Anne with some lady' didn't quite cut it.
2. If that is Sue Doughty, then perhaps her minders thought that a direct comparison would not work in Anne's favour.
3. Perhaps - just perhaps - they dropped this photo because a few moments after it was taken, Anne lost control and ate the toddler.
Anyone else?
Current theories:
1. It's a pretty awful scan, but that *doesn't* look like Sue Doughty to me. Maybe the image was dropped because a caption change to 'Anne with some lady' didn't quite cut it.
2. If that is Sue Doughty, then perhaps her minders thought that a direct comparison would not work in Anne's favour.
3. Perhaps - just perhaps - they dropped this photo because a few moments after it was taken, Anne lost control and ate the toddler.
Anyone else?
Labels: the usual rubbish
The photo was taken in daylight and not at dusk when creatures of the night emerge....
Posted by
lambethlad |
Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:18:00 PM
- | -
You also might want to ask Anne what Kat Fletcher (who I'm pretty sure that is in the top left-hand corner) thinks of the Tories. Because she's been pretty darn vocal against her this past week at the NUS conference...
Hardly a ringing endorsement :p
Posted by
Gary |
Sunday, April 10, 2005 1:35:00 AM
- | -
I've almost given up on asking Anne questions. When I email her, she ignores me - and when I call her, she tries to sidestep the substance of any query by insisting that I'm driven by blind hatred or anger.
Posted by
Tim |
Monday, April 11, 2005 8:42:00 AM
- | -