This entry was posted on
Tuesday, September 5th, 2006 at
10:01 am and is filed
under Tony ‘King Blair.
Sorry, but I have to begin with a cross between a timeline and a linkdump:
Guardian – Now is not the time for Blair to go, says Falconer
BBC – Blair exasperated with ‘speculators’
UPI – Analysis: Blair defies Labor calls to quit
The Times – New Labour or bust: a voice of defiance from country mansion
Blair Watch – Blair To Labour: You can’t survive without me!
The Times – Full transcript of interview with Tony Blair
PA – Pressure on Blair to name date
PA – More calls on Blair to reveal exit
BBC – Debate goes on over Blair’s exit
Scotsman – Blair allies launch broadside
Sunday Herald – Blair tells shocked whips: I’m staying on as PM until 2008
Independent – Blair: The clock is ticking for a ‘deluded’ and ‘self-indulgent’ PM clinging on to power
The Times – MPs tell Blair to stop the infighting
BBC – MPs’ letter demands Blair’s exit
Guardian – New Labour MPs to call on Blair to quit
Blair Watch – The Postman Always Calls Thrice
Which pretty much brings us up to date, with the exception of this brilliant blue-sky thinking from the same crowd that brought us the brilliant notion that voters abandoned Labour at the last election because; “people were angry with Tony because they love him so much, and they are angry because they think he might go.”
The Mirror – Exclusive: How Blair will go: A sensational memo leaked to the Mirror reveals how Labour experts are planning Tony Blair’s exit from No10. The retirement blueprint aims to promote the “triumph of Blairism” and allow the PM to quit on a wave of euphoria after 10 years in office. The secret strategy – drawn up by a small group of loyalists – is well under way… He last week failed to end speculation over his retirement date when he ruled out naming the day at Labour’s annual conference in Manchester later this month. He pointedly accused Cabinet Ministers and Labour MPs, led by Mr Brown, of “obsessing” over the timing. Yet the No 10 memo reveals how the issue is dominating thinking deep inside the Downing Street bunker. Iraq also continues to cast a long shadow over the Premier’s record, the document openly acknowledges. It says: “We need to incorporate this into our media plan. It’s the elephant in the room, let’s face up to it.” The memo concludes: “Most importantly, are we up for it? Is TB up for it?”
I have no doubt that facing up to Iraq will involve an ‘open debate’ much like this one, where the elephant in the room is carefully portrayed as follows:
On the face of it, there appears to be a lot of ground changing hands, but – in reality – Blair has already won this argument… because none of the main players are talking about the need for handcuffs.
UPDATE (8:30pm) – Hello, Tom. Welcome to the party….
:o)
BBC – Minister joins Blair exit demands: One minister and four government aides are among 17 normally loyal Labour MPs who have written to Tony Blair urging him to quit. The MPs – including junior defence minister Tom Watson – say they want an end to uncertainty. Senior minister Hilary Armstrong later said Mr Blair would be gone by the time of the 2007 Labour conference. Forty-nine Labour MPs have so far signed a statement saying they are satisfied with a 12-month timetable. But others – including a group of Labour MPs elected in 2005 who are thought to be drafting their own letter to Mr Blair – want him to quit immediately.
UPDATE – Bob Piper – Revolting MPs
UPDATE (6 Sep) – Don’t think for a second that the fat lady is singing; so far, all we’ve heard is a fart from the usher…
Independent – MPs tell Blair to come clean on date of departure: Tony Blair has been hit by an open mutiny among previously loyal Labour MPs who are threatening to force him out of Downing Street unless he agrees to stand down soon.
Independent – A question of timing and tactics in a pointless fight: At Westminster, the clamour is growing for Mr Blair to lay out some sort of “timetable” for his departure. Such a timetable would make Mr Blair even more of a lame duck then he is at present, and he knows it. It would not quell speculation about his departure and his successor, merely intensify it. These demands are also spurious. The MPs responsible plead that they simply want some clarity regarding Mr Blair’s plans, but their real intention is to ease him nearer the exit without appearing overtly disloyal.
PA – Blair to quit in a year – Miliband: Speculation over Tony Blair’s future was fuelled as one of his closest Cabinet allies said he expected the Prime Minister to leave office within the next 12 months. Environment Secretary David Miliband said it was “reasonable” to suppose the PM sees himself staying in 10 Downing Street for about one more year. The comment, coming from the arch-Blairite former head of the PM’s policy unit, sparked instant speculation in Westminster that he had been authorised to speak out to clear the air over Mr Blair’s plans and stave off backbench rebels. But the PM’s official spokesman said only: “David Miliband has said what he believes the conventional wisdom to be and what that means. So be it, that’s his right. We have nothing more to say. Cabinet ministers will say what Cabinet ministers want to say.”
Hm… how about that? The folks at the Sun are free to say what they want to say, too… and here are the numbers that they ‘pulled out of the air’…
Downing Street Echo – Blair tells aides he quits May 31: Tony Blair will leave 10 Downing Street for the last time as Prime Minister more than a decade after his historic 1997 landslide win. The Sun can reveal that he has finally decided to step down as Labour leader on May 31 next year – exactly ten years and 30 days after becoming PM.
Guardian – Blair’s offer: I will go in a year Brown: that’s not good enough: Gordon Brown made clear yesterday that Tony Blair’s coded offer to leave Downing Street within the next 12 months was not good enough. Allies of the chancellor said that Mr Brown was demanding that the prime minister set a timetable for his departure and make the details public. Mr Brown also wants Mr Blair to rein in the chancellor’s critics, such as Stephen Byers and Alan Milburn, who have been making speeches and writing newspaper articles arguing that Blairite reforms be continued after he has stepped down.
And *still* none of the main players are talking about those all-important handcuffs…
Guardian – Blair’s legacy is a reckless adventure that’s wreaked havoc the world over
BSSC – That Non-Existent Timetable In Full
UPDATE (6 Sep 11:33am) – A heads-up via Wibbler…. Tom Watson has resigned from his position as Under-Secretary of State for Defence and Minister for Veterans. Waiting for Iain Dale to take credit in 3, 2, 1…
Sky News – Blair To Go ‘Next Summer’: In the first political move of the day, Labour MP Tom Watson resigned as a junior defence minister, saying that it was not “in the interest of either the party or the country” for Tony Blair to remain in office.”
UPDATE – Beau Bo d’Or’s view on letters and leaks
By Garry September 5, 2006 - 2:10 pm
The Labour Party has become so spineless that I’m sadly doubtful they’ll ever force Blair to “resign in shame”.These letters seem designed to push him a bit while allowing him to “keep his dignity intact”. (It is astonishing that anyone thinks “Yo Blair” has any dignity left but that’s neither here nor there at the moment.) At this stage, if it’ll put an end to the damage his “war” on terror is doing, I’m of a mind to prefer that got rid of him that way than not at all.It is possible that the best chance to shame Blair and hold him to account will come after he has gone and he’s lost the influence and protection of being PM.
By goatchurch September 5, 2006 - 6:25 pm
I think the reason he’s not giving a timetable for his departure has nothing to do with retaining his authority, as the ministers keep lying, knowing full well that rigid time-tables are not a problem in any other democratic country.The purpose of this game is solely so he can pick his successor by giving the chosen one advance foreknowledge of the date and enabling him to get into position, whilst everyone else is barred from campaigning. That’s the direct and intended effect of this charade.Needless to say, the choice of successor is one matter that should be none of his f***ing business whatsoever. He should get out and get lost and entirely clear off so that other people can repair the damage. This will include prosecuting him for serious warcrimes, so he feels he does have an interest.In the same way that the vote on Iraq ensures that the only qualified MPs for the governing positions are liars willing to commit the worst crimes, the chosen successor’s qualities are that he must be able to keep the lid on Blair’s crimes for long enough for him to pack his bags and fly to Warshington.
By Wibbler September 6, 2006 - 11:30 am
Your friend Tom’s resigned…