This entry was posted on
Tuesday, March 17th, 2009 at
12:30 am and is filed
under The Political Weblog Movement.
Everybody who comments on this weblog or emails me has the right to privacy, and I will go out of my way to respect that right… right up until the moment when anonymous/secret threats are made.
Make a threat from a dark corner and there is a very real danger that I will shine a spotlight in your direction.
On that note, this looks like the only statement we’re going to get out of Glen Jenvey:
from Tim Ireland
to glenjenvey
date Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:34 PM
subject A statement by 9am tomorrow, pleaseNo more lies or threats or irrelevant claims about extremism, please. Just the statement will do fine.
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2009/03/glen_jenvey_is_toast.aspCheers
Tim
–
from glenjenvey@aol.co.uk
to Tim Ireland
date Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:42 PM
subject Re: A statement by 9am tomorrow, pleaseIs your email a threat? to me. if so i might have to go to the police. grow up you child.tim your a waste of space who supports terrorist at ummah.com as i said for the last time i’m going to sue the Guardian newspaper. and i’m very interested in why you are so interested in certain names? maybe you are the people you keep trying to say others are. i would suggest you stop writting to me as i have past each of your emails to the police already like i have the last one.
–
Original Message—–
From: Tim Ireland
To: glenjenvey@aol.co.uk
Sent: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:18 pm
Subject: Re: A statement by 9am tomorrow, pleaseNo, this is what a threat would look like:
“Glen Jenvey and his associates have until 9am tomorrow to issue a statement *OR* I name the mysterious ‘Mike’…”
But what I said was:
“Glen Jenvey and his associates have until 9am tomorrow to issue a statement *BEFORE* I name the mysterious ‘Mike’…”
I’m just trying to help you save yourselves, because I’m naming him at 9am.
You and Mike have 10 hours to put your side of the story forward first.
If you don’t want me to write to you, don’t ask questions and expect answers.
Send the police whatever you please within reason..
(I say ‘within reason’ because I’d hate for you to get in trouble for wasting police time.)
Cheers
Tim
–
from glenjenvey@aol.co.uk
to Tim Ireland
date Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:35 PM
subject Re: A statement by 9am tomorrow, pleaseWho is mike? is that another name you say i posted under? you are in a dream world i do not know who you are talking about now.
–
from Tim Ireland
to glenjenvey@aol.co.uk
date Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:41 PM
subject Re: A statement by 9am tomorrow, pleaseYou know who Mike is, because you tell me who Mike is in the audio that you helpfully authenticated.
His name gets published at 9am, with or without your statement.
Oh, and I wll remind you again that you really shouldn’t ask me questions and expect answers if you don’t want me to email you.
Cheers
Tim
–
from glenjenvey@aol.co.uk
to Tim Ireland
date Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:52 PM
subject Re: A statement by 9am tomorrow, pleasedo you not understand no one is taking any notice of you creep.but yes watch out in the dark you never know who might be around the corner.
–
from Tim Ireland
to glenjenvey@aol.co.uk
date Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:02 AM
subject Re: A statement by 9am tomorrow, pleaseNow *that* is a threat.
No matter. You still have until 9am.
Cheers
Tim
–
So I still won’t be naming names until 9am, but that chat with the police has gone from ‘maybe’ to ‘definitely’.
By mikkimoose March 17, 2009 - 12:49 am
Seems AOL didn't shut down his email, despite his spamminghttp://www.planetfeedback.com/index.php?level2=bl…PS.I trust this means you'll put my comment back linking to Jenvey's posts giving his full home address (helpfully including the postcode).You'd think someone claiming the "abu hamza mob has sent hundreds of death threats already to me and im a police witness this must be against the law and he should be arrested? can anyone advice on british law on jihadi's threating a police offical witness can he be arrested…?glen"would be more careful about making threats about people in the dark.
By Manic March 17, 2009 - 1:30 am
Interesting, no, and I agree.
By ian March 17, 2009 - 9:36 am
How did he manage to pose as a reporter with such appalling grammar and spelling?